Berlin Terror Attack happened yesterday with at least 9 dead and 50 Injured as truck plowed into crowd at Christmas market. According to the German press: "the alleged truck driver had arrived in the country this year as a refugee from Pakistan."
German anti-refugee MEP blames Angela Merkel for Berlin attack: 'Those are her dead!' And it's obvious, only a short-sighted or the externally manipulated government could open borders for the refugees after the participation in their bombing by NATO and other wars all over the world. It is natural and expected that the suffered people will counter-attack making sabotage and acts of terrorism. Lets look at the news published several years ago: Pakistan To Boycott Key Meeting In Germany In Protest Over NATO Raid That Killed Its Troops. Lets look at modern blogs that reflect perception of Germany by some people: Who would win a war between Pakistan and Germany (if Germany was not a NATO member)?
Lets look at the history of the modern terrorism to understand why it exists. The USA (together with Saudi Arabia and Pakistan's ISI) baked and supported Mujaheddins movement in Afghanistan since 1980-th to destabilize the USSR, afterwards this movement subdivided into Taliban (which was supported by the US government up to 1996) and another part. After the USSR crashed, The Islamic State of Afghanistan was found in 1992, where the USA with NATO fight against the Taliban nowadays and kill Talibs by drones. A significant part of mujahideens were minted by Osama bin Laden since 1980th with the help of CIA specialists, and later become the core of Al-Qaeda with thousands of members-terrorists. The ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant) and ISIS (and Islamic State in Iraq and Syria) emerged a few years later, it was originated as Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad in 1999 by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Zarqawi was one of mujahideens having tight relations with Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda. ISIS used to start the anti-government movement in Syria since 2011. The Syrian government fights against both Al-Nusra (a part of Al-Qaeda) and ISIS. Besides the Middle East, Al-Qaeda and ISIS used to destabilize and start revolutions in Egypt and Libya. As for the US interests in Libya, then Muammar Gaddafi succeed to transform Libya into the socialistic state with the highest level of life, where both medicine, education and even houses provided to the citizens for free. Moreover, Gaddafi built a free irrigation system with the potable water in Libya and was going to extend it to the whole Africa, for which he named the "King of the kings of Africa". Libya was a paradise on the Earth and the main treat for the US government debunking the vastly branded stereotype of the "highest life standards in the US". By the way, throwing away emotions and evaluating logically, the ongoing situation is profitable for the US democrats. They have financed rebels and revolutions all over the world, especially in the Middle East, to control the oil price, to sale water in Africa and to gain the control over the ruined countries in general. The refugee crisis in EU is a side-effect, but even it provides a positive impact on the US economy, raising demand for their export (including weapon) & services (including defense and extension of the military bases).
Am I writing a conspiracy theory? - If yes, then the US presidential debates, the statements of both Clinton and Trump are also a "conspiracy theory": look at the second presidential debate, where Trump explains how the former US governments baked rebels and destroyed Libya, how created ISI and other terrorists including the once operated in Syria that kill civilians. And a few minutes earlier Clinton told how she would equip Kurdish people facilitating the war that will make even more refugees for EU. It seems, for Obama/Clinton in cooperation with NATO it was not sufficient to destroy the Libya's Water Infrastructure in 2011 and leave Africa without the free potable water. Of cause, the former citizens of the ruined country will counter-attack and join to terrorists organizations like Al-Qaeda. They make terror acts not just to kill somebody, but to show their response to the government and to attract attention of the mass-media that never reported about how other countries were ruined. As for the EU, then it performs a very "selective help" as Bashar Assad says in Syria, which also has never been reported by the EU/US mass-media.
Am I writing a conspiracy theory? - If yes, then the US presidential debates, the statements of both Clinton and Trump are also a "conspiracy theory": look at the second presidential debate, where Trump explains how the former US governments baked rebels and destroyed Libya, how created ISI and other terrorists including the once operated in Syria that kill civilians. And a few minutes earlier Clinton told how she would equip Kurdish people facilitating the war that will make even more refugees for EU. It seems, for Obama/Clinton in cooperation with NATO it was not sufficient to destroy the Libya's Water Infrastructure in 2011 and leave Africa without the free potable water. Of cause, the former citizens of the ruined country will counter-attack and join to terrorists organizations like Al-Qaeda. They make terror acts not just to kill somebody, but to show their response to the government and to attract attention of the mass-media that never reported about how other countries were ruined. As for the EU, then it performs a very "selective help" as Bashar Assad says in Syria, which also has never been reported by the EU/US mass-media.
Most of the population does not care about what is happening in the world, where their country is participating and what it might cause. Citizens just follow official mass-media of their country until suffering from some war or terrorism. As for the Berlin Terror Attack then Initially one talib was suspected in it and afterwards ISIS took the responsibility. Anyway, the highest danger caused by the forced adoption of the huge amount of refugees is even not the raised number of terror acts, it is the rising hate to Muslims in the EU and western world among the population. This hate is baked indirectly by the governments with unintentional and direct support of the state mass-media. The governments, particularly Angela Merkel and François Hollande, artificially organized a rapid demographic shift by their policies, which is acknowledged by any official. The native Germans already becoming minority in some districts, which might cause loss of the control over the own country in near future given the democracy and majority voting. Unlike the events happened 80 years ago starting from the hate of Jews officially inflicted by Hitler and evolved to the second World War, this time the government boosts a similar hate indirectly by their actions, by the extreme liberalization to the immigrants and again using the state mass-media to boost the desired perception. The EU/US mass-media does not report how most of the Islam world (especially Syria and Iran) fights against Al-Qaeda, ISIS and other terrorists. Because of this silence, many citizens project the hate of ISIS and terrorism to the whole Islamic civilization. The US government does not make this mistake and clearly separates ISIS from Islam for their citizens. The emerging mutual hate and terrorism is the result and the fault of the government, not of the blamed immigrants or a particular religion as perceived by some part of the western population. In the worst case, the rising and unfair hate to Muslims might evolve into one more global war in Eurasia, which should be prevented.
Nobody wants to be a terrorist to be killed in the end. To stop the terrorism we need to understand why some persons commit it and avoid projecting of the particular groups (ISIS) to the whole civilizations (Islam). Mainly, people perform counter-attacks in form of the terror acts because of the destroyed life, ruined homes and killed families. To stop terrorism and prevent growth of Al-Qaeda / ISIS, the society should rebuild the Middle East instead of destroying it, we should help each other instead of fighting. The EU government should help to the Middle East governments that fight against terrorists (Al-Qaeda and ISIS) and then help to rebuild the destroyed infrastructure to facilitate return to refugees back to their native countries. It's simple and without any conspiracy: no war => no refugees => no crimes. Refugees commit crimes more frequent than citizens, because some of them suffered from the government of the corresponding country and came to counter-attack, and others just lack the means of existence and have to steal to survive. It could be more profitable for EU to rebuild homes of the refugees rather than supporting them inside the EU. This is possible considering a huge difference of the life cost in the third world countries versus the EU.
The first steps to resolve the emerged crisis with refugees and terrorism could be at least to stop equipping rebels with the weapon, stop financing the wars, stop bombing cities and killing people at their homes by drones and to start take care about own borders. Acts of terrorism occur only in the countries, which take part in killings by the explicit military attacks. That is why the suffered countries are mainly the USA and their NATO partners (the main of them are the United Kingdom, France and Germany). As for the borders, it's an insane (or a brilliant external manipulation) to hold the borders open in the current situation. This is one of the main reasons why the United Kingdom left EU and accepts much less refugees. Therefore, at least until the damage made to the Middle East and Asian countries is somehow compensated by the USA and their NATO assistants, the borders should not be transparent. The EU should take care about the local citizens... As for the refugees, then the really valuable help for most of them would be to rebuild their own homes in the native countries.
The first steps to resolve the emerged crisis with refugees and terrorism could be at least to stop equipping rebels with the weapon, stop financing the wars, stop bombing cities and killing people at their homes by drones and to start take care about own borders. Acts of terrorism occur only in the countries, which take part in killings by the explicit military attacks. That is why the suffered countries are mainly the USA and their NATO partners (the main of them are the United Kingdom, France and Germany). As for the borders, it's an insane (or a brilliant external manipulation) to hold the borders open in the current situation. This is one of the main reasons why the United Kingdom left EU and accepts much less refugees. Therefore, at least until the damage made to the Middle East and Asian countries is somehow compensated by the USA and their NATO assistants, the borders should not be transparent. The EU should take care about the local citizens... As for the refugees, then the really valuable help for most of them would be to rebuild their own homes in the native countries.
No comments:
Post a Comment