Monday, December 26, 2016

A Brief History of the Modern Terrorism

People should be aware about the history of the modern terrorism to understand why it exists and how to resist it. Nowadays killers-terrorists were baked using ideology of ultra-nationalist and radical religious groups and were attracted mainly by propaganda.

The USA (together with Saudi Arabia and Pakistan's ISI) baked and supported Mujahideens movement in Afghanistan since 1980-th to destabilize the USSR, afterwards this movement subdivided into Taliban (terrorists that were supported by the US government up to 1996) and another part. A significant part of mujahideens were minted by Osama bin Laden since 1980th with the help of CIA specialists, and later become the core of Al-Qaeda with thousands of members-terrorists. The US investment firm Carlyle Group was one of the financial supporters of Bin Laden (and, hence, of Al-Qaeda), where James Baker (the Former White House Chief of Staff), Frank Carlucci (the Former United States Secretary of Defense), and both Georges Bush (US presidents) took an active participation. The responsible CIA officers (Mr. Milton Bearden) even were awarded after the USSR started war in Afghanistan. During that war the USA supplied different weapon including recently designed at that time (and earlier prohibited for the export) Stinger missiles to Mujaheddins (later Taliban and Al-Qaeda) as the only effective weapon against the Soviet Mi-24/6 helicopters. After the USSR crashed, The Islamic State of Afghanistan was found in 1992, where the USA with NATO fight against the Taliban nowadays and kill Talibs by drones. During the second presidential debate Trump explained how the former US governments baked rebels and destroyed Libya, how created ISI and other terrorists including the once operated in Syria that kill civilians and fight against the Syrian government headed by Bashar Assad. And a few minutes earlier Clinton told how she would equip Kurdish people facilitating the war that will make even more refugees for the EU. The Syrian president Bashar Assad claims that the US and EU have helped to the terrorists. The Turkish president Tayyip Erdogan confirms that the US and NATO backed terrorism in the Middle East, particularly the US and EU support the terrorists in Turkey.


The well-known terrorist organizations ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant) and ISIS (and Islamic State in Iraq and Syria) were originated as Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in 1999. Zarqawi was one of mujahideens having tight relations with Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda. Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad merged with people from al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) and other radical groups into ISIL/ISIS (ISI) in 2006. There is a direct relation between Al-Qaeda and ISI, and the difference is that ISI is a state-like formation of Al-Qaeda, which has not only external financing, but also takes taxes on the occupied territory. Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is the leader of ISI (and then ISIL), but before this he was in the US prison and was released in 2004 together with other terrorists to support the US governance of Iraq that resulted in ISI foundation. ISI was one more US project to destabilize and control the Middle East starting from Iraq and North Africa, mainly Libya. But ISI went out of control and resulted in ISIL and ISIS, who started fighting against everyone including the USA. The US officials confirm that even nowadays at least 1/3 of the "special" prisoners recently released by Obama return to ISIL/S. Today even Mike Flynn, the 18th Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, confirms the responsibility of the USA about the ISIL/S formation.
The ISIS used to start the anti-government movement in Syria since 2011. The Syrian government (with support of Russia and Iran) fights against both Al-Nusra (a part of Al-Qaeda) and ISIS. As for the US interests in Libya, then besides just being one of the largest oil producers, Muammar Gaddafi succeed to transform Libya into the socialistic state with the highest level of life, where both medicine, education and even houses provided to the citizens for free. Moreover, Gaddafi  built  a free irrigation system with the potable water in Libya and was going to extend it to whole Africa, for which he named the "King of the kings of Africa". Libya was a paradise on the Earth debunking the vastly branded stereotype of the "highest life standards in the US"... The USA have financed rebels and revolutions all over the world and especially in the Middle East and North Africa, to control the oil price, to sale water in Africa and to gain the control over the ruined countries in general. In the end, everything went out of the control and resulted in the uncontrollable international terrorist organizations (Taliban, Al-Qaeda, ISIL, ISIS and others). All adequate US politics, including Bernie Sanders, criticize such budget spendings by the former governments for the Cold War.

Did the terrorists were artificially baked and supported by the USA only in the Middle East and North Africa since 1980-th? - No, it started much earlier. After the Second World War the USA supported fascists and Nazi, moving their scientists to own country, that operation called Paperclip. But not only scientists were supported, in particular Ukrainian Resurgent Army (UPA) / OUN (Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists) and UNA (Ukrainian National Army, former Waffen SS Galicia) were saved by the USA from the Soviet execution. Nowadays these forces are represented by Pravy Sektor (Right Sector) and UNA-UNSO (The Ukrainian National Assembly), who are ultra-nationalists in the official Ukrainian Government. One can say that the modern OUN and UNA-UNSO have nothing common with the former organizations, but these are still the same organizations with the same decalog that was composed in 1929 by Stepan Lenkawski, whose ideology resulted in killing of up to 200 000 Poles and not less people of other nations (mainly Jews). The decalog gives 10 main precept of the Ukrainian Nationalist, some of them are: "1. Attain the Ukrainian state or die in the struggle for it. ... 7. Do not hesitate to commit the most dangerous act (offense), if required for the goodness. 8. Meet the National enemies with the hate and reckless fight. ...". UPA/OUN and UNA collaborated in the mass murderer of Jews and Poles during World War II and the corresponding investigation was always blocked by the CIA after the Second World War.
The USA supported both Maidan revolutions in Ukraine and financed them at least with $5 Billion from the US budget, which similar to what they did in the Middle East (and what is resulted in Taliban and Al-Qaeda). OUN instructed mujahideens in Afghanistan in 1980th, Chechen's rebels against Russia in 1990th (and now jihads and terrorists have helped to the Ukrainian Nazi). Since 2010th Pravy Sector (Right Sector) and UNA-UNSO became the main force of Maidan protest in Ukraine, they still use Nazi swastika and don't hide their Nazi ideology. Now Pravy Sektor and UNA-UNSO are part of the official government... After the Maidan, Natalie Jaresko came from the US Department of State in Washington, D.C. to become Ukrainian's minister of finance. Moreover, the Ukrainian citizenship for Natalie Jaresko was provided promptly directly by the Ukrainian president to qualify her to take the office. Joe Biden (US vice president) says he talks to Petro Poroshenko (Ukrainian president after the Maidan 2014) more frequently than with his own wife. Moreover, not only the USA, but also the EU supports current Ukrainian government with Nazi. It is an insane taking into account that Europe was fully occupied by Nazi during the Second Word War... Of course (and fortunately), OUN and Pravy Sector are minority in the Ukrainian government, but still could it happen in the EU? Would Germany or any other EU country accept the presence of Nazi at their governments ever again?

Thus, the terrorists do not appear suddenly from nowhere, they are baked and supported with substantial resources by the governments to facilitate specific geopolitical interests. The existence of terrorism mostly depends on the governments that control the international currencies, especially on the USA... Ukraine should also take harsh measures to prevent spreading of the Nazi ideology and the EU should insist on it facilitating the corresponding measures. Anyway, the more citizens will know about the roots of terrorism, the harder it will be for governments to bake and support it, the faster our society will shut down the terrorism. Hopefully, existent non-mainstream media will spread more and more enlightening emerging events and their roots from all perspectives unlike the manipulated or censored mass-media. Hopefully, people will do care about the ongoing events and start analyzing the situation looking at causes and historical associations instead of assisting revolutions been guided by the mass-media as herds of sheep. Nothing occurs without investments, preparation, causes and motivation, which should be discovered and analyzed in any global change by each of us before drawing any conclusions and instead of the connivance forced by the government and oligarchs.

Tuesday, December 20, 2016

Why do Refugees Commit Crimes? - Thoughts About the Berlin Terror Attack.

Berlin Terror Attack happened yesterday with at least 9 dead and 50 Injured as truck plowed into crowd at Christmas market. According to the German press: "the alleged truck driver had arrived in the country this year as a refugee from Pakistan."



German anti-refugee MEP blames Angela Merkel for Berlin attack: 'Those are her dead!' And it's obvious, only a short-sighted or the externally manipulated government could open borders for the refugees after the participation in their bombing by NATO and other wars all over the world. It is natural and expected that the suffered people will counter-attack making sabotage and acts of terrorism. Lets look at the news published several years ago: Pakistan To Boycott Key Meeting In Germany In Protest Over NATO Raid That Killed Its Troops. Lets look at modern blogs that reflect perception of Germany by some people: Who would win a war between Pakistan and Germany (if Germany was not a NATO member)?


Lets look at the history of the modern terrorism to understand why it exists. The USA (together with Saudi Arabia and Pakistan's ISI) baked and supported Mujaheddins movement in Afghanistan since 1980-th to destabilize the USSR, afterwards this movement subdivided into Taliban (which was supported by the US government up to 1996) and another part. After the USSR crashed, The Islamic State of Afghanistan was found in 1992, where the USA with NATO fight against the Taliban nowadays and kill Talibs by drones. A significant part of mujahideens were minted by Osama bin Laden since 1980th with the help of CIA specialists, and later become the core of Al-Qaeda with thousands of members-terrorists. The ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant) and ISIS (and Islamic State in Iraq and Syria) emerged a few years later, it was originated as Jama'at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad in 1999 by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. Zarqawi was one of mujahideens having tight relations with Osama bin Laden and Al-QaedaISIS used to start the anti-government movement in Syria since 2011. The Syrian government fights against both Al-Nusra (a part of Al-Qaeda) and ISISBesides the Middle East, Al-Qaeda and ISIS used to destabilize and start revolutions in Egypt and Libya.  As for the US interests in Libya, then Muammar Gaddafi succeed to transform Libya into the socialistic state with the highest level of life, where both medicine, education and even houses provided to the citizens for free. Moreover, Gaddafi  built  a free irrigation system with the potable water in Libya and was going to extend it to the whole Africa, for which he named the "King of the kings of Africa". Libya was a paradise on the Earth and the main treat for the US government debunking the vastly branded stereotype of the "highest life standards in the US". By the way, throwing away emotions and evaluating logically, the ongoing situation is profitable for the US democrats. They have financed rebels and revolutions all over the world, especially in the Middle East, to control the oil price, to sale water in Africa and to gain the control over the ruined countries in general. The refugee crisis in EU is a side-effect, but even it provides a positive impact on the US economy, raising demand for their export (including weapon) & services (including defense and extension of the military bases). 

Am I writing a conspiracy theory? - If yes, then the US presidential debates, the statements of both Clinton and Trump are also a "conspiracy theory": look at the second presidential debate,  where Trump explains how the former US governments baked rebels and destroyed Libya, how created ISI and other terrorists including the once operated in Syria that kill civilians. And a few minutes earlier Clinton told how she would equip Kurdish people facilitating the war that will make even more refugees for EU. It seems, for Obama/Clinton in cooperation with NATO it was not sufficient to destroy the Libya's Water Infrastructure in 2011 and leave Africa without the free potable water. Of cause, the former citizens of the ruined country will counter-attack and join to terrorists organizations like Al-Qaeda. They make terror acts not just to kill somebody, but to show their response to the government and to attract attention of the mass-media that never reported about how other countries were ruined. As for the EU, then it performs a very "selective help" as Bashar Assad says in Syria, which also has never been reported by the EU/US mass-media.


Most of the population does not care about what is happening in the world, where their country is participating and what it might cause. Citizens just follow official mass-media of their country until suffering from some war or terrorism. As for the  Berlin Terror Attack then Initially one talib was suspected in it and afterwards ISIS took the responsibility. Anyway, the highest danger caused by the forced adoption of the huge amount of refugees is even not the raised number of terror acts, it is the rising hate to Muslims in the EU and western world among the population. This hate is baked indirectly by the governments with unintentional and direct support of the state mass-media. The governments, particularly Angela Merkel and François Hollande, artificially organized a rapid demographic shift by their policies, which is acknowledged by any official. The native Germans already becoming minority in some districts, which might cause loss of the control over the own country in near future given the democracy and majority voting. Unlike the events happened 80 years ago starting from the hate of Jews officially inflicted by Hitler and evolved to the second World War, this time the government boosts a similar hate indirectly by their actions, by the extreme liberalization to the immigrants and again using the state mass-media to boost the desired perception. The EU/US mass-media does not report how most of the Islam world (especially Syria and Iran) fights against Al-Qaeda, ISIS and other terrorists. Because of this silence, many citizens project the hate of ISIS and terrorism to the whole Islamic civilization. The US government does not make this mistake and clearly separates ISIS from Islam for their citizens. The emerging mutual hate and terrorism is the result and the fault of the government, not of the blamed immigrants or a particular religion as perceived by some part of the western population. In the worst case, the rising and unfair hate to Muslims might evolve into one more global war in Eurasia, which should be prevented.


Nobody wants to be a terrorist to be killed in the end. To stop the terrorism we need to understand why some persons commit it and avoid projecting of the particular groups (ISIS) to the whole civilizations (Islam). Mainly, people perform counter-attacks in form of the terror acts because of the destroyed life, ruined homes and killed families. To stop terrorism and prevent growth of Al-Qaeda / ISIS, the society should rebuild the Middle East instead of destroying it, we should help each other instead of fighting. The EU government should help to the Middle East governments that fight against terrorists (Al-Qaeda and ISIS) and then help to rebuild the destroyed infrastructure to facilitate return to refugees back to their native countries. It's simple and without any conspiracy: no war => no refugees => no crimes. Refugees commit crimes more frequent than citizens, because some of them suffered from the government of the corresponding country and came to counter-attack, and others just lack the means of existence and have to steal to survive. It could be more profitable for EU to rebuild homes of the refugees rather than supporting them inside the EU. This is possible considering a huge difference of the life cost in the third world countries versus the EU.

The first steps to resolve the emerged crisis with refugees and terrorism could be at least to stop equipping rebels with the weapon, stop financing the wars, stop bombing cities and killing people at their homes by drones and to start take care about own borders. Acts of terrorism occur only in the countries, which take part in killings by the explicit military attacks. That is why the suffered countries are mainly the USA and their NATO partners (the main of them are the United Kingdom, France and Germany). As for the borders, it's an insane (or a brilliant external manipulation) to hold the borders open in the current situation. This is one of the main reasons why the United Kingdom left EU and accepts much less refugees. Therefore, at least until the damage made to the Middle East and Asian countries is somehow compensated by the USA and their NATO assistants, the borders should not be transparent. The EU should take care about the local citizens... As for the refugees, then the really valuable help for most of them would be to rebuild their own homes in the native countries.